Chicago Bears vs Bengals match player stats from the November 2, 2025 game tell a bigger story than the 47-42 final score suggests. Caleb Williams threw three touchdowns without an interception, rookie running back Kyle Monangai rushed for 176 yards, and Joe Flacco piled up 470 passing yards in a loss that was decided in the final seconds.
This article walks through every major performance from both sides, explains which numbers actually shaped the result, and answers the questions fans usually search for after a game like this. You will find the scoring by quarter, the top offensive and defensive performers, two stat tables, and a clear verdict on who played best.
Who Won the Bears vs Bengals Game and Who Played Best?
The Chicago Bears beat the Cincinnati Bengals 47-42 at Paycor Stadium on November 2, 2025. The best individual performance belonged to Bears quarterback Caleb Williams, who completed 20 of 34 passes for 280 yards and three touchdowns with zero interceptions.
That answer comes with a fair amount of competition. Monangai’s 176 rushing yards drove the Chicago offense, tight end Colston Loveland scored twice and caught the winning touchdown, and Flacco’s 470 yards were the biggest passing total of the game. Williams earns the top spot because he protected the football while the Bengals quarterback gave it away twice.
Game Background: Bears at Bengals on November 2, 2025
The game was played in Cincinnati in 50-degree weather in front of 66,264 fans, with Clete Blakeman serving as the head official. Chicago arrived as a slight road favorite, and the final result was a shootout that neither defense controlled for long.
Cincinnati led at halftime, 20-17, after Charlie Jones returned a kickoff for a touchdown in the first quarter and both offenses kept scoring in the second. Chicago took the lead in the third quarter, the Bengals answered with a late rally, and the game turned on two scoring drives inside the final minute. Here is how the points came in, quarter by quarter.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Bears | 7 | 10 | 14 | 16 | 47 |
| Cincinnati Bengals | 10 | 10 | 7 | 15 | 42 |
Chicago outscored Cincinnati 16-15 in the fourth quarter, which sounds close, but the final two scores happened within 40 seconds of each other. Andrei Iosivas caught a 9-yard touchdown from Flacco with 54 seconds left, and Evan McPherson’s extra point put the Bengals ahead 42-41. Seventeen seconds remained when Williams found Loveland on a 58-yard touchdown pass. The two-point try failed, but the Bears still led 47-42 and Cincinnati had no time to answer.
Chicago Bears vs Bengals Match Player Stats
The table below pulls together the most important individual lines from the game. Numbers come from the box score data published by Covers and theScore.
| Player | Team | Position | Key Stats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb Williams | Bears | QB | 20/34, 280 yds, 3 TD, 0 INT; 5 rushes, 53 yds |
| Kyle Monangai | Bears | RB | 26 carries, 176 yds; 3 catches, 22 yds |
| Colston Loveland | Bears | TE | 6 catches on 7 targets, 118 yds, 2 TD |
| DJ Moore | Bears | WR | 4 catches, 72 yds; 1 rush for 17 yds and a TD; 1/1 passing for a 2-yd TD |
| Olamide Zaccheaus | Bears | WR | 6 catches on 8 targets, 58 yds, 1 TD |
| Joe Flacco | Bengals | QB | 31/47, 470 yds, 4 TD, 2 INT |
| Tee Higgins | Bengals | WR | 7 catches on 9 targets, 121 yds, 2 TD |
Caleb Williams: Efficient, Careful and Clutch
Williams finished with a 114.8 passer rating, and the raw yardage figure of 280 undersells his day. He was sacked only twice for nine yards, avoided every turnover, and added 53 yards on five carries. The last throw, the 58-yarder to Loveland, came with the game on the line and Cincinnati’s offense just coming off its own go-ahead score.
His catch total is unusual too. The box score credits Williams with two receptions for 22 yards and a touchdown, which is not something a starting quarterback typically records. It suggests a creative Chicago game plan, one that also gave other skill players a chance to throw.
Kyle Monangai and the Chicago Ground Game
The quiet star of the afternoon was Monangai. His 26 carries for 176 yards, including a long run of 39, helped Chicago rush for 283 yards on 37 attempts as a team. That workload kept the Bears offense on the field for 34:30, a full nine minutes more than Cincinnati held the ball.
Brown added 37 yards and a touchdown on five carries, and Moore scored on a 17-yard run. Williams chipped in another 53 yards. The Bengals defense simply had no answer for the volume of rushing the Bears threw at it.
Colston Loveland, Olamide Zaccheaus and DJ Moore
Loveland led all Bears receivers with 118 yards on six catches and two touchdowns, including the 58-yard game winner. Zaccheaus gave Chicago steady production underneath with six catches for 58 yards and a score. Moore caught four passes for 72 yards, then threw a 2-yard touchdown pass, a rare line for a wide receiver.
Tight end Cole Kmet caught one pass for 10 yards, and Monangai added three catches for 22 yards out of the backfield. The distribution shows a balanced attack, which is part of why Cincinnati could not key on one threat.
Cincinnati Bengals Player Stats
Flacco put up the loudest numbers of the game. He completed 31 of 47 attempts for 470 yards, four touchdowns and two interceptions, which translated to a 109.4 passer rating. Cincinnati’s net passing total was 449 yards after three sacks cost the offense 21 yards.
Tee Higgins was his top target, finishing with seven catches on nine targets for 121 yards and two touchdowns. Iosivas caught the 9-yard score that briefly gave Cincinnati the lead late in the fourth quarter. Jones, who returned a kickoff for a touchdown in the first quarter, helped push Cincinnati’s return yardage to 309, more than double Chicago’s 140.
The running game was the problem. Cincinnati managed 46 yards on 15 carries, so Flacco was asked to carry the offense almost entirely through the air. Full individual rushing, receiving and defensive lines for the Bengals were not available in the sources reviewed for this article, so only the confirmed numbers are listed here.
Bears Defense Stats: Interceptions, Sacks and Tackles
Chicago’s defense gave up 449 net passing yards, yet it still deserves credit for creating the turnovers that kept the Bears ahead of the Bengals in the game’s decisive stretches. Cornerback Nahshon Wright intercepted Flacco and returned the ball six yards, and linebacker Tremaine Edmunds also came away with an interception.
The pass rush produced three sacks, one each from Austin Booker (10 yards), Montez Sweat (6 yards) and Chauncey Gardner-Johnson (5 yards). Those three plays accounted for all 21 yards lost by Cincinnati on sacks. In the tackle column, Tyrique Stevenson led with six, Edmunds finished with nine total (five solo, four assisted), and Gardner-Johnson and Kevin Byard III each recorded five solo stops. Jaquan Brisker added six combined tackles.
Team Stats Comparison
Individual numbers matter, but the team totals explain why Chicago won a game in which the opposing quarterback threw for nearly 500 yards. The following table compares the main team categories.
Adding the rushing and passing columns, Chicago gained roughly 576 net yards compared with about 495 for Cincinnati. The Bears also finished with no turnovers, while the Bengals gave the ball away three times (two interceptions and one lost fumble). In a game with 89 combined points, those three extra possessions mattered more than any single big play.
What the Stats Reveal That the Final Score Does Not
Most recaps focus on Flacco’s 470 yards, but passing volume does not always translate to winning. Cincinnati threw 47 times because it needed to chase points, and it never established the run. The Bears did the opposite, using the ground game to control the clock and wear down the front seven.
Special teams are the other detail worth noticing. Cincinnati’s return yardage advantage was huge, and the kick return touchdown by Jones gave the Bengals an early lead that Chicago spent most of the game answering. Without that score, the offensive output from both teams would have looked far more lopsided in Chicago’s favor.
Red zone efficiency also separated the teams. The Bears converted four of six trips inside the 20, while Cincinnati converted two of four. Chicago was also perfect in goal-to-go situations, going 2 for 2, compared with 2 for 4 for the Bengals. In a game decided by five points, those missed chances were costly.
Earlier Bears and Bengals Meetings
This was not the first time these teams have traded blows, although meetings are infrequent because they play in different conferences. Chicago won 20-17 at Soldier Field on September 19, 2021, in a game where Joe Burrow threw three interceptions. The Bears also won 33-7 in Cincinnati on December 10, 2017. Going further back, the Bengals won a 45-10 blowout at home on October 25, 2009.
The clubs met again in the 2026 preseason at Paycor Stadium on August 22. Preseason box scores should be read cautiously, since quarterbacks such as Case Keenum and Miller Moss appear in Chicago’s passing stats and starters usually play limited snaps. For a true measure of how the two rosters compare, the November 2025 regular-season game remains the most useful reference.
Where This Game Fits in Bears and Bengals History
Franchise history helps explain why the matchup draws attention. The Chicago Bears were a charter member of the NFL in 1920 and are one of the league’s oldest teams, while the Cincinnati Bengals began play in 1968 and have built their identity in the AFC North. Because the two clubs rarely meet, a high-scoring game like this one tends to stand out.
Readers who like this style of breakdown can also review the full player stats from the Rams and Ravens matchup, or look at another Chicago team in our box score analysis of the Cubs and Mets game.
Conclusion
The Chicago Bears vs Bengals match player stats show a team that won with balance and discipline against a team that lost despite huge passing numbers. Williams delivered three touchdowns without a turnover, Monangai powered a 283-yard rushing attack, and Loveland caught the winning score with 17 seconds left. Cincinnati’s Flacco and Higgins played well enough to win on many days, but three turnovers and almost no running game kept the Bengals from closing it out.
If you want a short takeaway, it is this: the Bears won the possession battle, protected the ball, and made the last big play. Williams was the best player on the field, and the stat sheet backs that up.
FAQs
Who won the Chicago Bears vs Bengals game?
The Chicago Bears won 47-42 at Paycor Stadium in Cincinnati on November 2, 2025. A 58-yard touchdown pass from Caleb Williams to Colston Loveland with 17 seconds left decided it.
Who had the most passing yards in the Bears vs Bengals game?
Cincinnati quarterback Joe Flacco threw for the most yards, completing 31 of 47 passes for 470 yards, four touchdowns and two interceptions. Caleb Williams passed for 280 yards for Chicago.
Who was the leading rusher for the Bears?
Rookie Kyle Monangai led all rushers with 26 carries for 176 yards and a long run of 39 yards. The Bears ran for 283 yards as a team on 37 attempts.
How many touchdowns did Caleb Williams throw?
Caleb Williams threw three touchdown passes and no interceptions. He also ran five times for 53 yards and caught a touchdown pass himself, according to the box score.
Who scored the game-winning touchdown for the Bears?
Tight end Colston Loveland caught the game-winning touchdown, a 58-yard pass from Caleb Williams with 17 seconds remaining. It was his second touchdown of the game, and he finished with 118 receiving yards.
How did the Bears defense perform against the Bengals?
The Bears defense recorded two interceptions (Nahshon Wright and Tremaine Edmunds) and three sacks (Austin Booker, Montez Sweat and Chauncey Gardner-Johnson). It allowed 449 net passing yards but forced the turnovers that helped Chicago win.
Where can I find the full Bears vs Bengals box score?
Full box scores are available from sources such as Pro Football Reference, ESPN, Covers and theScore, along with the official team websites. Individual Bengals rushing and defensive stats can be checked there for the complete picture.
